Skip to content

Sample Accessibility Conformance Report

SAMPLE — fictional product, not a real report. The rows show the structure and the level of detail; a real report covers every criterion.

Example LMS Accessibility Conformance Report

International Edition, based on VPAT® Version 2.5 INT

Name of Product/Version
Example LMS, version 4.2 (web)
Report Date
Example: 30 October 2026
Product Description
A web-based learning management system for course content, assignments and grades.
Contact Information
[email protected]
Evaluation Methods Used
Automated testing, followed by manual testing by an accessibility specialist: keyboard only, NVDA 2025.1 with Chrome, VoiceOver with Safari on macOS, zoom to 400%, contrast measurement. Ten key screens listed in the appendix.

Applicable Standards/Guidelines

  • Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2 — Level A: Yes; Level AA: Yes; Level AAA: No
  • Revised Section 508 standards (Jan 2017, corrected Jan 2018) — Yes
  • EN 301 549 Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services — V3.2.1 (2021-03) — Yes

Terms

  • Supports: the functionality has at least one method that meets the criterion without known defects.
  • Partially Supports: some functionality does not meet the criterion.
  • Does Not Support: the majority of functionality does not meet the criterion.
  • Not Applicable: the criterion is not relevant to the product.

WCAG 2.2 Report

Table 1: Success Criteria, Level A (example rows)
CriteriaConformance LevelRemarks and Explanations
1.1.1 Non-text Content (Level A)Partially SupportsCourse images uploaded by staff have alt text fields. Three icons in the grade book toolbar have no text alternative (Grade book > Toolbar).
2.1.1 Keyboard (Level A)SupportsAll functions tested with keyboard only, including the drag-and-drop file upload, which also offers a Browse button.
2.4.3 Focus Order (Level A)SupportsFocus order follows the visual order on all ten tested screens.
3.3.7 Redundant Entry (Level A, WCAG 2.2)SupportsThe enrolment form pre-fills details entered earlier in the same process.
4.1.2 Name, Role, Value (Level A)Does Not SupportCustom dropdowns in Settings do not expose their expanded state to screen readers (NVDA 2025.1, Chrome).
Table 2: Success Criteria, Level AA (example rows)
CriteriaConformance LevelRemarks and Explanations
1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) (Level AA)Partially SupportsBody text meets 4.5:1. Placeholder text in search fields measures 3.1:1.
1.4.10 Reflow (Level AA)SupportsContent reflows at 320 CSS pixels without horizontal scrolling, except data tables, which are exempt.
2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) (Level AA, WCAG 2.2)Partially SupportsThe cookie banner covers the focused element on the login page until dismissed.
2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum) (Level AA, WCAG 2.2)SupportsAll targets are at least 24 by 24 CSS pixels or have sufficient spacing.

Revised Section 508 Report

Chapters 3, 5 and 6 (example rows)
CriteriaConformance LevelRemarks and Explanations
302.1 Without VisionPartially SupportsSee WCAG 1.1.1 and 4.1.2.
502.3.1 Object InformationPartially SupportsSee WCAG 4.1.2.
602.3 Electronic Support DocumentationSupportsThe help centre was evaluated against WCAG 2.2 AA with the product.

EN 301 549 Report

Chapters 4 and 9 (example rows)
CriteriaConformance LevelRemarks and Explanations
4.2.1 Usage without visionPartially SupportsSee WCAG 1.1.1 and 4.1.2.
9.2.4.3 Focus orderSupportsSee WCAG 2.4.3.

Legal Disclaimer

Example: This report describes the product as tested on the report date. It is not a certification and does not state compliance with any law.

SAMPLE — fictional product, not a real report. The rows show the structure and the level of detail; a real report covers every criterion.

Back to VPAT / ACR service